The transcriptome data generated in the course of this work was compiled in a central database of toxicogenomic fingerprints. This database contains characteristic gene expression patterns for numerous reference substances that are linked to specific mechanisms of action and AOPs. New substances can be compared with this database based on their expression profiles and assigned to known types of effects.
A practical example: If a new chemical shows an expression pattern in a zebrafish embryo test that closely resembles a known estrogen receptor-mediated fingerprint, it is reasonable to suspect that it is a potential endocrine disruptor. Conversely, a profile that shows no clear matches with established problematic mechanisms of action can help to lower the risk assessment of a substance and focus resources on more critical candidates.
This approach enables broad-based, mechanistically sound screening early in the chemical development process. Companies can test substance libraries before costly animal studies or large-scale environmental studies become necessary. Substances with distinct fingerprints can be sorted out early on or investigated further, while indistinct candidates can be given higher priority in downstream development steps.
tPOD: Early warning thresholds for chronic toxicity
In addition to the qualitative classification of mechanisms of action, the derivation of quantitative thresholds plays a central role. In the ECHA project E-FET, we are further developing the transcriptomic point of departure (tPOD) for this purpose – a concept that identifies the concentration at which systematic, concentration-dependent changes in gene expression occur in zebrafish embryos, thus providing an early molecular warning point for chronic toxicity. In an extended Fish Embryo Test (E-FET), embryos are exposed to industrial chemicals across several concentration levels, after which the RNA is sequenced and modeled for numerous genes to determine how strongly their expression increases or decreases depending on the concentration. Benchmark doses are derived from these concentration-response relationships, and the tPOD is determined as a conservative low range of the BMD distribution (publication 4).
Systematic comparison with classic Fish Early Life Stage (FELS) studies shows that substances that cause significant effects on growth or survival in long-term tests usually also produce clear, concentration-dependent gene expression changes, and thus tPOD signals in the E-FET. While substances without chronic FELS effects generally do not show relevant tPOD responses. tPOD values are often in the same order of magnitude as NOEC values (No Observed Effect Concentration) from OECD TG 210 studies and often are conservative. Borderline cases—such as poorly soluble or unstable chemicals with exposure that is difficult to control—highlight the importance of careful exposure control and, where necessary, optimized test systems. Overall, the experience gained from the E-FET project to date suggests that, with well-controlled exposure, tPOD values are a robust measure of threshold concentration for chronic toxicity and are suitable for planning subsequent tests and prioritizing substances in risk assessment.
Added value for regulation, industry, and the environment
The combination of mechanistic effect screening and tPOD derivation offers a wide range of applications. For regulation, it opens up the prospect of basing decisions with greater emphasis on mechanistic evidence while reducing the number of laboratory animals used. In future testing strategies, toxicogenomic endpoints could help shorten test batteries, avoid redundant studies, and make the planning of long-term studies more targeted.
For industry, the approach provides a powerful tool for early risk assessment. Even in the substance design phase, candidates with problematic fingerprints can be identified and sorted out before high development investments are made. At the same time, tPOD values can help to define realistic but precautionary concentration ranges for further testing. This saves resources and increases planning reliability.
The toxicogenomic approach also offers clear advantages from an environmental and animal welfare perspective. The use of embryo models, combined with highly informative molecular measures, allows for a significantly more efficient use of biological resources. Fewer animals provide more information, and many questions can be addressed at very early stages of development without using legally restricted fish.